|
|
| Welcome to the Mercedes 190 forum Welcome to the Mercedes 190 owners forum, the place to be for all owners and lovers of the Mercedes 190E, 190 and 190D cars. Including Cosworth (2.3 16v and 2.5 16v), EVO 1 and EVO 2 models. Modified and concourse, track cars and daily drivers, all are welcome. This free UK based club was started back in November 2005 to serve the w201 community and now has over 4000 members from all around the world and 340,000 + posts. The members welcome you and encourage you to stay a while and have a look around. We offer you friendly chat and access to some very useful information as well as tutorials with photos and videos for many common repair and maintenance jobs. Whatever your needs there is a good chance you will be able to find what your looking for. Such as our Mercedes 190 buyers guide Sign up to gain access to all areas including for sale / classified areas and country wide meetings and events. Many forum features and sections are only available once you sign up. Join our us at mercedes190.co.uk! If you're already a member please log in to your account: |
| Exhaust; cat | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:28 pm (467 Views) | |
| red baron | Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:28 pm Post #1 |
|
Newbie
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Hi can anyone help , i have a 1990 190e 2.0 5 speed with a cat . I've heard you can remove the cat.What i need to know is what to replace it with? and what about the lamba sensor and the possible ecu issues. |
![]() |
|
| CrysAk | Fri Aug 24, 2007 8:04 pm Post #2 |
|
Moar Bass!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
i need info on this also ^^ anyhelp would be great (yes ill have a legal engine in for it :P) |
![]() |
|
| JensonGB | Fri Aug 24, 2007 8:20 pm Post #3 |
|
I Will Find One That I Keep!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I remember reading somewhere that if the O2 sensor is before the cat you shouldn't have any problems removing the cat. Thinking about it, the sensor is taking it's reading before the cat anyway, so why would it make a difference if the cat was there or not, unless the additional back pressure a cat makes enters the equation somewhere. If the senor is after the cat, then i can see issues arising, of course i could be completely wrong about it all, but it just seems logical to me |
![]() |
|
| JensonGB | Fri Aug 24, 2007 8:38 pm Post #4 |
|
I Will Find One That I Keep!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Just a thought! as well as gaining anywhere between 2-10 hp (depends on which forum you read!) at the high RPM range , you may lose some low down torque which is a consequence of reducing the back pressure by removing the cat |
![]() |
|
| Matt | Fri Aug 24, 2007 9:33 pm Post #5 |
![]()
Administrator - Hawk Eye
![]()
|
Firstly, in response to CrysAk's question, if you are putting an engine in which didn't have a cat fitted to it, dont bother fitting one on As for the cat removal, yes you can remove it and fit a straight thru pipe to both sections, but keep the Lambda plumbed in. The Lambda is after the cats by the way. |
![]() |
|
| roadwolf69 | Fri Aug 24, 2007 9:43 pm Post #6 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Don't confuse back pressure from baffle plates in the silencer with restriction from the cat, if you cut a catalytic converter open you would wonder how the exhaust gas gets out at all, its much like having your silencer filled with plaster of paris. |
![]() |
|
| CrysAk | Fri Aug 24, 2007 11:17 pm Post #7 |
|
Moar Bass!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
no matt , my cars got a cat fitted at the moment but im fitting a 91 engine that doesnt need a cat (i think...) so will need to remove the current cat
|
![]() |
|
| JensonGB | Sat Aug 25, 2007 7:45 pm Post #8 |
|
I Will Find One That I Keep!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Mines before the cat, towards the bottom of the down pipes..........is that not right? or does it sound like it's been modded some how? |
![]() |
|
| malco | Sun Aug 26, 2007 11:06 am Post #9 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Take a look at THIS thread. Has got a full diagram of the various systems. Looks like the sensor is before the cat. |
![]() |
|
| Matt | Sun Aug 26, 2007 5:41 pm Post #10 |
![]()
Administrator - Hawk Eye
![]()
|
No, look at the diagram of the top system. Thats the only one fitted with the 2x CATs and the sensor is after the cats and just infront of the middle box. Just fitted one today and thats exactly how it is. |
![]() |
|
| Matt | Sun Aug 26, 2007 5:43 pm Post #11 |
![]()
Administrator - Hawk Eye
![]()
|
Thats what I meant mate, don't fit one
|
![]() |
|
| Sev | Mon Sep 3, 2007 8:11 am Post #12 |
|
No Longer a Registered Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
wow, never heard of a o2 sensor *after* the catalytic. you would think they did that so you don't remove the cat. no laws against cat removal in the UK? all NAm exhausts have the o2 right where the downpipes converge. everything after that is fair game (until smog time, at least) |
![]() |
|
| Ukmerctechie | Mon Jun 22, 2009 9:13 pm Post #13 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The Cat in the top picture is the bigger box AFTER the O2 sensor,the smaller boxes at the top of the pipe are not Cats. The O2 sensor is needed before the cat so as not to allow rich mixture to hit the cat and burn it out,as well as regulating the co level.Newer management systems have twin sensors before and after the cat to evaluate the efficency of the cat. |
![]() |
|
| MICHAEL | Mon Jun 22, 2009 9:57 pm Post #14 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
My 2.5-16 doesn't have a cat, but does that mean it will have a Co2 sensor anway? |
![]() |
|
| Ukmerctechie | Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:08 pm Post #15 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
No mate no cat no sensor but it will have all the associated wiring fitted. |
![]() |
|
| balamb37 | Wed Jun 24, 2009 8:54 am Post #16 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Hi, If you remove the 'Cat' you have to leave the 'Lamda Sensor' in and connected otherwise your ECU won't know how to regulate the mixture and will go into 'Emergency Mode' and that isn't good for the motor or 'consumption'. And legally I think the year is pre-1991 after that you can get 'Done' for removing it. And the 'Lamda Sensor' IS ALWAYS BEFORE the 'Cat' those that look like 'cats' two off, are in fact only 'Expansion Boxes' |
![]() |
|
| protearose | Fri Jul 17, 2009 6:59 pm Post #17 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Hi. Have anyone actually removed their cat and replaced it with a straight through pipe and if so what was the result regarding performance etc. |
![]() |
|
| Phil_Irl | Sat Jul 18, 2009 1:16 am Post #18 |
|
3 Mercs and counting......
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I removed the CAT on my 92 190E auto..... she baffles now in the bottom of the down pipes and sounds a whole lot nicer and is quicker off the line then she was but in respect she does use a little more juice but worth it in my view.... Phil |
![]() |
|
| Andre F | Sat Jul 18, 2009 8:26 am Post #19 |
![]()
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I removed the cat on my 2,6... No significant power change, just more noise :-o But it had to go, it kept scraping speed bumps and what not... |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Exhaust · Next Topic » |






![]](http://209.85.122.89/static/1/pip_r.png)






3:29 AM Nov 8