Character Death [ALL READ]

hosted by Cbox.ws

Welcome to World Of Naruto. We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Which do you prefer, and why?
Keep current rule?	3 (33.3%)
Allow killing without permission?	1 (11.1%)
Divided areas?	3 (33.3%)
Other: Explain in your post.	2 (22.2%)
Total Votes: 9

Character Death [ALL READ]; Important!
Topic Started: Aug 23 2009, 02:05 PM (259 Views)
draik	Aug 23 2009, 02:05 PM Post #1
Kyuudaime Hokage Posts: 1,177 Group: Counsel Member #1,219 Joined: October 18, 2006	This issue has been bouncing around the staffroom for a while now, and it is mostly divided. We want you guys, the members, to tell us what you think on this issue. Even if we come up with a decision amongst ourselves, it's worthless if it doesn't conform to what you guys would like to see. Spoiler: click to toggle Option 1: Keep Current Rule? Killing other members without permission is not allowed. Only exception is if the character is a nuke-nin, in which they can be killed without permission, though cannot kill who attacks them without permission. Option 2: Allow killing without permission? Members can kill and be killed despite what the creator of the character wants. Pretty self-explanitory. Option 3: Divided Areas? A suggestion proposed in the staff room. Non-permission killing in select areas, permission killing in others, and non-kill areas. So, vote and then post your reasoning. If you don't post, then we won't be able to count your vote. This helps keep an accurate number. This will help us come to a solution about how to handle this. Staff are not allowed to vote in this poll. Please, no influencing members on their choices either. Edited by Spoon, Aug 26 2009, 10:29 AM.



Toratetsu	Aug 23 2009, 07:46 PM Post #2
Newbie Posts: 17 Group: Member Member #2,758 Joined: July 13, 2009	I vouch for a new/other rule in a sense. The current rule is a good grounds for the present situation as this, but I personally think that we should somewhat combine the idea. You shouldn't be allowed to run around and go kill other players' characters all willy-nilly, in the sense of if you have a grudge against a certain person for whatever reason and just want revenge. Permission killing should still remain the rule for anyone fighting in general, BUT... Consider this minor detail if you would. If you enter a battle with a nuke-nin you are crossing outside the proverbial 'barrier' that would protect your character from being killed without permission. What I mean is, if you fight with a nuke-nin, both characters are susceptible to death. Being able to kill a nuke-nin without fear of dying seems to defeat the purpose, yet (pertaining to nuke-nins mainly) you shouldn't be able to just randomly kill someone because you feel like it. It's more like a high-risk, high-reward type deal I suppose. It's just a thought that happens to be my opinion on the whole ordeal



Kutsuu	Aug 23 2009, 09:06 PM Post #3
*うんざり* Posts: 229 Group: Member Member #2,756 Joined: July 10, 2009	...it should not only be revolved around missing nin... you're basically saying it should remain the same... Edited by Kutsuu, Aug 23 2009, 09:06 PM.



Visching101	Aug 23 2009, 11:03 PM Post #4
Newbie Posts: 4 Group: Member Member #2,784 Joined: August 23, 2009	Toratetsu Aug 23 2009, 07:46 PM I vouch for a new/other rule in a sense. The current rule is a good grounds for the present situation as this, but I personally think that we should somewhat combine the idea. You shouldn't be allowed to run around and go kill other players' characters all willy-nilly, in the sense of if you have a grudge against a certain person for whatever reason and just want revenge. Permission killing should still remain the rule for anyone fighting in general, BUT... Consider this minor detail if you would. If you enter a battle with a nuke-nin you are crossing outside the proverbial 'barrier' that would protect your character from being killed without permission. What I mean is, if you fight with a nuke-nin, both characters are susceptible to death. Being able to kill a nuke-nin without fear of dying seems to defeat the purpose, yet (pertaining to nuke-nins mainly) you shouldn't be able to just randomly kill someone because you feel like it. It's more like a high-risk, high-reward type deal I suppose. It's just a thought that happens to be my opinion on the whole ordeal Im new to the site but would like to agree with this... The current rule seems good with needing permission to kill a character. Dividing the lands would be no different, cause the only people who would go the pvp lands, would be the people who would have already givin permission to kill them. But being allowed to attack and attempt to kill a missing nin without risking death yourself seem unfair. If you attack a missing nin in an attempt to kill them, you should in turn be giving consent for that character to kill you as well.



+Hohenheim	Aug 23 2009, 11:12 PM Post #5
Magnificent Bastard Posts: 2,708 Group: Elite Member Member #37 Joined: November 14, 2005	Now for my own feed back: The current rule is you need permission. However, against a missing nin or a nuke-nin only they can be killed. The same goes for the Tailed Beasts. When they are caught they are dead. Without the persons permission but that is a stated fact and well known. I am on the idea of the divided areas. And no, some thrill seekers will also go into the PvP lands. And no, not everyone going there will be going there for battles. Some will go there to RP about how close they are to being killed, or even than. Some people could also fake character deaths there. Think about it in the sense, I've killed two ... no... I've killed three of my characters and have had on revived before the new rule was stated about the death = no revival NO EXCEPTIONS rule was placed. Also, I bring this up for everyone: If you want the PvP lands, than guess what, you shouldn't be sad or mad when you're character is killed. And before you even think Rank has anything to do about it, I've seen a few people do a much better job as genin than as kage points to self Who knows... I like the different area's part... though for a while I used to think the outer banks was just for PvP... who knows... Maybe Maria will explain that sometime to the staffers.



Kutsuu	Aug 24 2009, 11:16 AM Post #6
*うんざり* Posts: 229 Group: Member Member #2,756 Joined: July 10, 2009	...let me reestablish a small portion of what i have already stated in the past because it seems like people just skipped or forgot about everything... Quote: Any ninja who kill others of the same or opposite village without the consent of a kage or some higher authority would automatically have to be a missing nin. I'm sure either the bingo book, or the character templates will prove useful in finding out who is what and vice versa. Basically, what my ideas were with this is for Missing nin or villagers bound to be dubbed as missing to kill without the "consent of the victim", possibly only in specific reigons as in the country side and other areas. Certain places within villages however would generally have the "consent to be killed rule" to raise the safety of the villagers and villages alike. On the other hand, If a villager decided to attack someone of the same village as them, the consent shouldn't necessarily be needed due to the fact that is more than likely going to be a form of betrayal, thus classifying the ninja as missing nin unless the villagers somehow never were informed of the acts. Which would make story lines a hell of a lot more than just interesting. Any character in or out of "RP" can die. It is as simple as that. The only problem that would occur is if people made attepts to "god mod" their way to victory, that just cannot happen.



Kadomatsu	Sep 14 2009, 02:46 PM Post #7
Reach out and torch someone. Posts: 1,387 Group: Counsel Member #59 Joined: December 4, 2005	Everyone, don't forget to post your reasoning. We currently have three uncounted votes.



1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · Site Announcements · Next Topic »