| Focus Group 5/6 Specials; Specials offered to Upper Elementaries | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Mar 15 2006, 07:17 AM (3,021 Views) | |
| Michelebel | Mar 15 2006, 02:49 PM Post #31 |
|
Principal
|
Well, of course we call them by their individual names. I don't ask my son, "how was your 'special' today". But when referring to these classes as a whole, they are referred to as "specials", so by calling them "specials" now, no one is trying to dress them up and call them something else. They are the same thing and are being called the same thing. Difference is they are being enhanced now for the 5th/6th graders, and they are offering additional ones. |
![]() |
|
| Rose | Mar 15 2006, 02:52 PM Post #32 |
|
Principal
|
Well, I was just referring to the lower el and what they are called at my school. I never heard the word "specials" until this was brought up with the LI. |
![]() |
|
| Rose | Mar 15 2006, 02:57 PM Post #33 |
|
Principal
|
Michelebel, this is my original post. I had never heard of these classes being referred to as "specials" in lower el and was trying to understand your posts. Why are you being so defensive? |
![]() |
|
| Michelebel | Mar 15 2006, 03:08 PM Post #34 |
|
Principal
|
Sorry didn't mean to sound defensive. When you said you called these classes art, music and gym, it seemed like you were implying....duh, what else would they be called!! I think the schools/admin call them "specials" when lumping them all together. Our school's website lists them as specials........ sorry.........didn't mean to stress this point. But I was trying to point out that they are not trying to fool us by calling them specials now under the LI; they have always been called specials, at least in our school. |
![]() |
|
| Rose | Mar 15 2006, 03:10 PM Post #35 |
|
Principal
|
That's OK. Thanks for clearing that up.
|
![]() |
|
| for our kids | Mar 15 2006, 03:14 PM Post #36 |
|
Principal
|
Both my 1st, & 4th grader @ Roosevelt refer to any other instruction outside of their classroom as a "special", be it Gym, Art, or Music. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Mar 15 2006, 03:21 PM Post #37 |
|
Deleted User
|
http://www.nwrel.org/scpd/sirs/10/c020.html Many educators past and present have argued for large schools on grounds of curriculum quality. Following James Conant's original line of reasoning, they argue that larger schools can offer more numerous and more varied curricular offerings than small schools can. Therefore, goes the argument, operating small schools with more limited curricula is unfair to the students who attend them. While this has a certain common sense appeal, examination of the research reveals that there simply is no reliable relationship between school size and curriculum quality (Fowler and Walberg 1991; Gregory 1992; Howley 1994, 1996; McGuire 1989; Melnick, et al. 1986; Monk 1987, 1992; Monk and Haller 1993; Nachtigal 1992; Pittman and Haughwout 1987; Rogers 1987; Williams 1990). For one thing, researchers have found that "it takes a lot of bigness to add a little variety"—that is, "on the average a 100% increase in enrollment yields only a 17% increase in variety of offerings" (Pittman and Haughwout, 337). Moreover, "[t]he strength of the relationship between school size and curricular offerings diminishes as schools become larger. Increases in the size of very small schools are associated with greater curricular gains than increases in the size of larger schools" (Monk 1992). For another thing, researchers have found that the allegedly richer curriculum that larger schools are able to support tend to be made up, not of higher-level courses in, say, math or foreign languages, but rather of additional introductory courses in non-core areas. For still another, investigators have found that only five to twelve percent of the students in large schools avail themselves of the extra courses these schools typically offer (McGuire 1989; Monk 1992; Rogers 1987). Finally, Monk, in his 1987 study of the size-curriculum relationship, concludes that, "it is possible to offer at the 400 pupil level a curriculum that compares quite favorably in terms of breadth and depth with curriculums offered in much larger settings" (27). Beyond these findings, the development and use of distance learning and other technologies in isolated settings is increasing and can be expected to further ameliorate curriculum inequalities. |
|
|
| Administrator | Mar 15 2006, 08:27 PM Post #38 |
|
Administrator
|
Can we find out what her research was? |
![]() |
|
| Cindi | Mar 15 2006, 08:41 PM Post #39 |
|
Principal
|
Unfortunatly that research was not provided in the hand out. I just took a few notes when she was speaking. She was one of the few who did not read from the hand out. |
![]() |
|
| NFarquharson | Mar 15 2006, 10:30 PM Post #40 |
|
Principal
|
Back on track to the specials. I found this policy about phys ed and recess: STATE OF MICHIGAN STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION POLICY ON QUALITY PHYSICAL EDUCATION A child’s intellectual growth cannot take place without having met his or her basic physical needs. The curriculum for every child’s preschool through high school experience should include the opportunity to participate in quality physical education programs and other health-enhancing physical activity. I. The State Board of Education recommends that all public schools offer physical education opportunities that include the components of a quality physical education program. Quality physical education programs positively impact students’ physical, social, and mental health. It is the unique role of quality physical education programs to provide opportunities for children to understand the importance of physical activity and to acquire skills to combat a sedentary lifestyle. A quality physical education program addresses three critical issues: curriculum, instruction and assessment, in conjunction with an opportunity to learn and should include the following: Curriculum: Has a curriculum aligned with the Michigan K-12 Physical Education Content Standards and Benchmarks. Equips students with the knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary for lifelong physical activity. Influences personal and social skill development. Instruction and Assessment: Is taught by a certified physical education teacher trained in best practice physical education methods. Aligns curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Engages students in curriculum choices that prepare them for a wide variety of lifetime activities. Keeps all students involved in purposeful activity for a majority of the class period. Builds students’ confidence and competence in physical abilities. Includes students of all abilities. Opportunity to Learn: Offers instructional periods totaling 150 minutes per week (elementary) and 225 minutes per week (middle and high school). Has a teacher to student ratio consistent with those of other subject areas and/or classrooms. Provides facilities to implement the curriculum for the number of students served. Has enough functional equipment for each student to actively participate. Builds students’ confidence and competence in physical abilities. Includes students of all abilities. 1 National Association for Sport & Physical Education. “What Constitutes a Quality Physical Education Program?” 2 Michigan’s Exemplary Physical Education Curriculum Project. (2001). EPEC Lessons – Grades K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, User’s Manual and Teaching/Learning Progressions. II. The State Board of Education recommends that all public schools offer daily opportunities for unstructured physical activity, commonly referred to as recess, for all students pre-K through grade six. Recess should be in addition to physical education class time and not be a substitute for physical education. Each school shall provide proper equipment and a safe area designated for supervised recess in the elementary setting. School staff should not withhold participation in recess from students or cancel recess to make up for missed instructional time. Schools should provide opportunities for some type of physical activity for students in grades seven through twelve apart from physical education class and organized sports. Adopted September 25, 2003 I don't think we currently are meeting these guidelines, are we? I noticed the point about not withholding recess. This was used by one of my son's teachers in the past as a means of punishment. I wish I had known. |
![]() |
|
| ktmom | Mar 15 2006, 10:33 PM Post #41 |
|
Principal
|
That is very interesting Nancy. It is being used currently by one of my sons teachers now. |
![]() |
|
| angrymom | Mar 15 2006, 10:40 PM Post #42 |
|
Principal
|
I wish they would follow this at our school with the kindergardeners. They get no recess and no unstructered play time. It's all work,work,work |
![]() |
|
| NFarquharson | Mar 15 2006, 10:48 PM Post #43 |
|
Principal
|
I completely agree with you on that. Young children ARE learning when they play. That free play time in so valuable! It's almost as though we (the entire society) feel the need to schedule everything for our children rather than letting them play, either together or alone, and use their imaginations. |
![]() |
|
| insupport | Mar 15 2006, 11:19 PM Post #44 |
|
Principal
|
My daughter is in eighth grade and I know they did not have a library special in 5th and 6th grade. They did go to the library to check out books with the teachers but it wasn't a class per se. They also used it for research projects etc. This must be new in the last few years. My first grader does have computers but I believe it is the classroom teacher that takes them to this. If I remember correctly the instruments could be used for free in 5th grade and then you could rent or purchase them in 6th grade. I can't remember why or if I ever knew why. |
![]() |
|
| insupport | Mar 15 2006, 11:43 PM Post #45 |
|
Principal
|
An interesting fact that I actually first heard about on the radio. The national PTA has revealed that a study was done regarding recess practice. I was surprised to find out that very few states have mandates for recess. Also 40% of schools have eliminated recess altogether or only have minimal time for recess. Some have recess but it is 30 minutes for lunch and recess. I had no idea about any of this. Anyway I couldn't find the exact research that was done but I googled pta/recess/research and found some very interesting articles about the research. It is unfortunate that we live in a society that continues to increase the learning bar so that kids are pushed and pushed more. I'm not saying that kids shouldn't learn in school but where is the time to learn through play. Teachers have commented to me that their curriculum is so full that they don't even get to do special projects for holidays etc. anymore. It seems like everyting else these days it's all about keeping up with society. |
![]() |
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Livonia Neighbors Archive · Next Topic » |




11:45 AM Jul 13