More "psycho-babble"........

Pages:
1
2

More "psycho-babble"........; from the O & E
Tweet Topic Started: Feb 26 2006, 11:48 AM (1,448 Views)
professionalmom	Feb 26 2006, 07:40 PM Post #16
Principal Posts: 244 Group: Members Member #293 Joined: January 26, 2006	Jimid Feb 26 2006, 07:00 PM MrTeacher always has respectful and thoughtful posts. No disrespect to MrTeacher.....just disappointment w/ O&E.



anothermom	Feb 27 2006, 12:41 AM Post #17
Principal Posts: 108 Group: Members Member #250 Joined: December 29, 2005	The Observer-bashing is a new and interesting angle. I have seen every CFLF meeting on the front page. Where is the objection? What is behind the suggestion that the O&E is a "phamplet" for LPS? What is the coverage opposers think they deserve that they are not getting? Perhaps the Observer has realized like so many of us that there is no "deep story" to "investigate".



lpsproposalsrbad	Feb 27 2006, 01:17 AM Post #18
Principal Posts: 248 Group: Members Member #58 Joined: October 31, 2005	Please remember that this is a very emotional issue. (Duh) VIEWS AND OPINIONS EXPRESSED ON THIS FORUM, MAY NOT REFLECT THE VIEWS OF EVERYONE OPPOSED TO THE LI. CFLF has NOT made a statement of this kind regarding the Observer, WHATSOEVER.



c3hull	Feb 27 2006, 02:28 AM Post #19
Principal Posts: 1,422 Group: Members Member #17 Joined: October 25, 2005	anothermom Feb 27 2006, 12:41 AM The Observer-bashing is a new and interesting angle. I have seen every CFLF meeting on the front page. Where is the objection? What is behind the suggestion that the O&E is a "phamplet" for LPS? What is the coverage opposers think they deserve that they are not getting? Perhaps the Observer has realized like so many of us that there is no "deep story" to "investigate". anothermom, you say perhaps the O&E has realized like "so many of us" (where?) there is no story, just after you mention all of the front page coverage of CFLF. Isn't that a contradictary statement? I think the LI is terrible, but I have never bashed the O&E personally. I do agree with many others on here that I do not enjoy reading editorials by the few supporters that don't have much credibility behind their support for the LI. I would gladly welcome some facts that would make me feel different. So far, there have been NONE!



klezy99	Feb 27 2006, 07:54 AM Post #20
Principal Posts: 100 Group: Members Member #75 Joined: November 2, 2005	klezy99 Feb 26 2006, 05:54 PM Is is true we did not get the TRO it was denied? is this a fact?



fyi	Feb 27 2006, 09:41 AM Post #21
Principal Posts: 2,738 Group: Members Member #206 Joined: December 9, 2005	When I posted this topic, I was not criticizing the O & E. I was just letting everyone know where the article came from..... I did not agree with the information in the article because of how I feel about the LI.



klezy99	Feb 27 2006, 09:48 AM Post #22
Principal Posts: 100 Group: Members Member #75 Joined: November 2, 2005	anothermom Feb 27 2006, 12:41 AM The Observer-bashing is a new and interesting angle. I have seen every CFLF meeting on the front page. Where is the objection? What is behind the suggestion that the O&E is a "phamplet" for LPS? What is the coverage opposers think they deserve that they are not getting? Perhaps the Observer has realized like so many of us that there is no "deep story" to "investigate". to anothermom: why are you trying to nit-pick every comment on this forum, I think you know how deeply this LI affects us on this site,, PLEASE why dont you VOLUNTEER your time to the fundraising, and you can donate some money while your at it. After all it is for ALL OUR CHILDREN..



fyi	Mar 3 2006, 07:40 AM Post #23
Principal Posts: 2,738 Group: Members Member #206 Joined: December 9, 2005	MrTeacher Feb 26 2006, 03:30 PM How can you guys say this is psyco babble....it was answered by a licensed therapist. Who determines what psyco babble is??? Maybe it's really a concerned parent who has a child just like many of us, and they are grasping at straws..at least it was an answer with a solid foundation. Now, maybe it's pysco babble if it isn't a real letter, maybe sent in by someone misrepresenting themselves. Either way, it should be taken seriously. MRTEACHER I know a lot of people who have a license to drive, but shouldn't be on the road! Almost got sideswiped by one yesterday!



klezy99	Mar 3 2006, 08:24 AM Post #24
Principal Posts: 100 Group: Members Member #75 Joined: November 2, 2005	Has anyone read the Spring 06 YOUTH community education enrichment class paper yet? Because inside it states that there are NO SUMMER ENRICHMENT CLASSES due to many internal, district and building changes..They found it necessary to cancel their regular summer schedule.... HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



cmic	Mar 3 2006, 02:42 PM Post #25
Principal Posts: 1,530 Group: Members Member #217 Joined: December 11, 2005	You have got to be kidding me!



klezy99	Mar 6 2006, 10:34 AM Post #26
Principal Posts: 100 Group: Members Member #75 Joined: November 2, 2005	klezy99 Mar 3 2006, 08:24 AM Has anyone read the Spring 06 YOUTH community education enrichment class paper yet? Because inside it states that there are NO SUMMER ENRICHMENT CLASSES due to many internal, district and building changes..They found it necessary to cancel their regular summer schedule.... HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Just bringing this up again.

Free Forums. Reliable service with over 8 years of experience. Learn More · Sign-up Now
« Previous Topic · Livonia Neighbors Archive · Next Topic »

Pages:
1
2